Previous Page  37 / 169 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 169 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing On-Farm Food Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

23

Table 2.5: Literature Review on Roots and Tubers Losses

Countries

Cassava

Yams

Sweetpotatoes Potatoes

Notes

SSA

23.5%

41.6%

43.6%

21.6%

Averages of many

studies

Bangladesh

6%

Benin

13.6%

Guyana

6.5%

Nigeria

28%

37%

AGRA case studies

West Africa

10-50%

Pakistan

12%

Tajikistan

22%

Turkey

7%

Uganda

20-25%

20-25%

UNIDO

Estimates

Sum of 10-80% in

processing root crops

Range

6.5-28%

10-41.6%

43.6%

6-22%

10-80%

Source: Okoh 1997; Bokanga, 1999; Amusa et al., 2003; Rees and Bancroft, 2003; UNIDO 2004; Zulfiqar et al., 2005;

Hossain 2009; AGRA, 2013; Tatlıdil et al., 2013; Affognon et al.,2014; Nabieva 2015,Craig et al., 2015; Mohammed

et al., 2015.

For on-farm losses in production and harvesting there is a lot less information to report. Benin

and Guyana (cassava), Nigeria (cassava and yams) and Tajikistan and Turkey (potatoes) have

published reports of on-farm losses. Overall, the limited information for on-farm losses for

tropical root/tuber crops in the OIC Member Countries shows a range of losses that are similar

to the FAO estimates.

Table 2.6: Literature Review on On-farm Losses of Roots and Tubers Losses

Countries

Cassava

Yams

Sweetpotatoes Potatoes

Notes

Benin

13.6%

Guyana

6.5%

Nigeria

28%

37%

Damage during harvest

Tajikistan

4.9%

Turkey

7%

Range

6.5-28%

37%

4.9-7%

Source: Okoh 1997; Bokanga, 1999; Amusa et al., 2003; Rees and Bancroft, 2003; UNIDO 2004; Zulfiqar et al., 2005;

Hossain 2009; AGRA, 2013; Tatlıdil et al., 2013; Affognon et al.,2014; Nabieva 2015,Craig et al., 2015; Mohammed

et al., 2015.