Improving Institutional Capacity:
Strengthening Farmer Organizations in the OIC Member Countries
3
have also been leaders in innovative policies aimed at making FO registration easier, reducing
tax burdens, and setting up ways to support FOs in the field. Full, country-level details on the
findings of the research are given in the Annexes.
The in-country visits and in-depth profiles of actual FOs found examples of
moderately strong
farmer organizations with generally good governance structures, business
fundamentals, and accountability to their members
(with some exceptions)
.
However, the
FOs profiled were not as strong on the provision of services (such as input, finance, and
storage) to their members, and while they often had a vision and many goals for the future,
they typically lacked a long-term, detailed strategic plan for achieving these goals. One of the
common themes of the interviews and profiles was that
farmer organizations face
challenges in finding the resources necessary to provide the services that their
members need.
Importantly, this challenge is exacerbated by the fact that FOs
now see
themselves as responsible for providing services that were often provided by
governments in years prior to the liberalization and globalization of agriculture.
While the enabling environment for FOs across the OIC is reasonably strong, some
specific challenges remain.
Recommendations for OIC Member Country engagement include:
Considering allocating additional financial resources to help relieve FOs’ current
burden,
specifically in the areas of agricultural extension and input provision
.
One of the
main findings of the case studies is
that
FOs across the OIC are asked to play a more
significant role in today’s globalized agriculture economy
than they were in the past, as
many activities traditionally provided by the government now are provided by FOs due to
government resource constraints
4
.
Establishing or expanding bodies with a specific mandate to strengthen FOs
, and then
sponsoring
periodic outreach to FOs to understand the performance of these bodies
.
This outreach to FOs could be part of a larger role to be played by FOs in consultations
between agricultural development funders and OIC Member governments. This is a proven
strategy for strengthening FO environments and is emphasized by the International Fund
for Agricultural Development (IFAD) when country-level agricultural intervention plans
are developed
5
.
Investing in advancing smallholder-focused agricultural finance
.
Banks across the OIC are experimenting with and introducing financial products to benefit
FOs. This innovation is aimed at meeting one of the chief needs of FOs by making working
capital and investment funds accessible. To help further this, market research could be
conducted, with the goals of: identifying the needs of FOs in specific regions,
understanding what challenges banks face in lending to FOs at present, and exploring
potential financial product solutions for farmer organizations. The expansion in credit
facilitated by such activities would help farmer organizations more effectively carry out
their missions to assist members by supplying inputs and facilitating access to markets.
Facilitating intra-OIC cooperation and links between COMCEC and other multilateral
groups.
In the context of economic and commercial cooperation, OIC Member Countries
could consider:
4
For a discussion of broad trends in liberalization and its impact on FOs, see Onumah, Gideon et al, “Empowering
Smallholder Farmers in Markets: Changing Agricultural Marketing Systems and Innovative Responses by Producer
Organizations”, 2007
5
IFAD, “IFAD and Farmer Organizations – Partnerships in Progress”, 2012