Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  73 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 73 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

59

Commodities exchanges typically suffer from a top-down approach that’s better at

attracting foreign aid than at improving farming practices and developing

transportation and communications networks while large trading volumes, a strong

financial sector, and a commitment to transparency – necessary for the success of

commodities exchanges - don’t yet exist in most (African) countries. South Africa’s

SAFEX has proven successful, however, for several reasons, which includes

innovations which created a favorable environment for both spot and futures trades,

the wide dissemination of SAFEX market data, the fact SAFEX price is widely used as

the reference price in forward contracts, and procedures and rules which evolved

along to meet the needs of the exchange’s users.

Marketing boards frequently fail due to limited institutional capacity, preventing them

from imparting stability to markets, their conflicting roles as both regulator and

market participant, disorderly liberalization, and removal the surplus reserve that was

used to moderate price volatility as the Côte d’Ivoire example showed. However,

marketing boards can succeed if their function is to facilitate effective market

operations rather than to control and participate directly in those markets.

Two public-private collaborations have been established in Indonesia: the Cocoa

Development Centers and PISAgro. The strength of the model, particularly the Cocoa

Development Centers, lies in the ability to align incentives among different actors in a

way that has typically not occurred in more top-down programs.

In many countries, market institutions are concentrated on a single sector or market

system in order to anticipate on technical challenges and needs of different commodity

groups. But in some cases, especially in countries in with limited infrastructure,

administrative capacity, and business climate, a more widely focused agency may be

more appropriate, especially when it functions as part of an integrated and

coordinated network of Government and private institutions. Such national

coordination agencies have been established in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Guyana and Brazil,

and have generally become successful despite some initial challenges.