Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  66 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 66 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance

:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

52

In 2009, Mars committed to buying 100% sustainable cocoa by 2020, and Hershey and Ferrero

have since made the same commitment.

Indonesia’s Partnership for Indonesian Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro)

The Partnership for Indonesian Sustainable Agriculture (PISAgro), founded in 2012, is a

network of public and private institutions, which aims to link food security, environmental

sustainability, and economic opportunity. Its membership includes four Indonesian

Government Ministries, 20 international and Indonesian companies (including multinationals

such as Nestle, Unilever, Bayer, and Cargill), the World Economic Forum, IFC, the Australian

Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, the IDH Sustainable Trade Initiative, Swisscontact (a

business-oriented independent foundation for international development cooperation active

in 34 countries), Mercy Corps, the John Deere Foundation, and UTZ, an international

sustainability certification organization.

PISAgro has 12 working groups, covering Agricultural Finance, Beef Cattle, Cocoa, Coffee, Corn,

Dairy, Horticulture, Palm Oil, Potato, Rice, Rubber, and Soybean and expert international

advisors to support each group. These groups work closely with farmers’ organizations to

increase productivity and incomes. As of 2016 PISAgro had worked with nearly 450,000

smallholder farmers cultivating some 350,000 ha., increasing productivity and incomes by

more than 12%.

2.5.4 National Coordinating Agencies

In many countries, market institutions are concentrated on a single sector or market system.

The examples cited above, from Indonesia, Côte d’Ivoire, and The Gambia, illustrate this

principle. There is much to be said for this, since the technical challenges and needs of different

commodity groups may differ widely, and a focused approach may be more appropriate. But in

some cases, especially in countries in which infrastructure, administrative capacity, and

business climate constraints are prevalent, a more widely focused agency may be more

appropriate, especially when it functions as part of an integrated and coordinated network of

Government and private institutions.

Ethiopia’s Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA)

Ethiopia’s Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA) is one example. The ATA is the apex

institution for implementation of the national Agricultural Transformation Agenda. Ethiopia

has modeled its agricultural transformation approach and agenda on the success

of countries

such as Taiwan, Korea and Malaysia. “The two main features in those countries’ models were:

1) a clear set of prioritized interventions to address the critical bottlenecks in a particular part

of the economy; and 2) a dedicated institution that supports senior policy makers and key

institutions with strategic input on planning, coordinating, implementing, tracking, evaluating,

and refining prioritized interventions to address identified bottlenecks.”

105

One innovative intervention by the ATA was the creation in 2014, in collaboration with the

Ministry of Agriculture, the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, and Ethio Telecom, a

105

Agricultural Transformation Agency (2017), Overview, available a

t http://www.ata.gov.et/ta/the-agricultural- transformation-agenda/

[Accessed June 2017].