Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  189 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 189 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

175

have such institutions, but they may not be necessary or especially cost-effective in countries

with small populations, limited financial resources, and/or small agricultural sectors.

Also, as discussed in Chapter 1, the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research

(CGIAR) and its many subsidiary research organizations, which focus on specific subsectors or

climatic regions (ICRISAT, for example) work actively in many OIC Member Countries, often in

partnership with other local and international organizations. It may be possible for these

institutions to integrate more fully with local institutions in some OIC countries in which such

coordination is relatively weak compared to other countries.

6.3 Recommendations for International Collaborative Efforts

International collaborative efforts are important to address similar challenges faced by OIC

Member Countries. In general, most OIC Member Countries need to create an enabling

environment attractive to agriculture, thereby specifically taking into account the small-scale

and fragmented nature of their agricultural marketing systems and the absence of integration

of small-scale subsistence farmers into agricultural markets.

It is especially this enabling role

which market institutions could play. A first step to do would be to create a market institution

responsible for registering farmers as already advocated in the previous Section. This would

be critical in monitoring, measuring, and evaluating the performance of the agricultural market

system through collecting, analyzing, and disseminating market intelligence. This would also

enable to better connect agricultural supply with processing and value-addition activities, and,

eventually, trade and export, as well as introducing and enforcing standards for quality inputs.

More specifically, several bottlenecks common across the three selected case study countries

demonstrate the inability of domestic farmers to get integrated in the agricultural marketing

system. These bottlenecks include:

Missing coordination between the various market participants of domestic agricultural

market channels (e.g. producers, collectors, distributors, and suppliers);

Absence of post-harvest management through a lack of collection and storage

infrastructure;

Ineffective overall management of the agricultural market, which adversely impacts

the quality and perishability of domestic commodities;

Drive to realize self-sufficiency with respect to basic food products and staple foods;

Lack of industrial competitiveness, value-addition, and the downstream processing of

agricultural products, which is vital for upgrading the export portfolio of the

agricultural sector;

Need for diversification of agricultural production to generate more and different

forms of rural employment; and

Protection of agricultural producers as opposed to only ensuring reasonable and stable

food prices for consumers.