Background Image
Previous Page  80 / 221 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 80 / 221 Next Page
Page Background

Risk Management in

Islamic Financial Instruments

51

buffer, and the leverage ratio, into IIFS. Since Islamic instruments are asset-based, profit-

sharing, agency or Sukuk, they are exposed to credit risk and/or market risk. Table 2 shows

the different types of Islamic instruments. Market risk arises from the cost of the asset to the

IIFS while the credit risk is based on the selling or leasing the asset to a second party. For

profit-sharing instruments such as Musharakah and Mudarabah, the risk is takes the form of

credit risk. The only exception is when the investments are in assets for trading purposes,

which become exposed to market risk. (IFSB 71-72).

Table 3.2: Types of Islamic Financial Instruments

Type

Islamic Instrument

Asset based on sale or purchase of an asset

Murabahah

Salam

Istisna

Sukuk

Asset-based on selling benefits of an asset

Ijarah

Profit-sharing

Musharakah

Mudarabah

Agency

Wakalah

Source: IFSB-IFSI Stability Report, 2013

The

ED-15

focused on five specific areas on improving capital adequacy standards. The draft

delineated the need to create a capital adequacy framework that would buffer exposure from

risk and address the capital adequacy requirements of risk exposures. A third objective was on

maintaining high-quality regulatory capital components that agree with Shariah principles.

Another standard revision was in regards to enhancing the capacities of capital adequacy

treatment of Sukuk issuances and securitization processes. Finally, the draft recommended

IIFS adopt international best practices on capital adequacy. Implementation of

ED-15

was

expected to begin on January 1, 2014 (IFSB 72).

Other efforts by the IFSB to further develop the infrastructure of the IFSI include improving

the supervisory review process through the revision of the IFSB-5, issuing a new Guidance

Note on integrating the Basel III liquidity standards into the IIFS, and creating a new Working

Group for the

IFSB Core Principles for Effective Regulation and Supervision of Institutions in the

IFSI.

The last initiative intends to create benchmarks to determine the quality of supervisory

systems in various jurisdictions and establish a baseline for Islamic finance supervisory

practices (IFSB 72-73).

3.3.2 Implementation Challenges for IFSB

So far, the IFSB has issued 16 published standards. While the IFSB has been making progress in

issuing Standard and Guiding Principle (SAG) for the IFSI, the full potential benefits of the SAGs

has yet to be captured. Authorities within the financial sector in jurisdictions with Islamic

finance show interest in adapting to the IFSB’s standards, but implementation of the

recommendations has been paltry. Some regulatory and supervisory authorities (RSA) believe

that Islamic finance makes up such a small part of the overall financial market and is at such an