Background Image
Previous Page  54 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 54 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

Activation Policies for the Poor in OIC Member States

46

Legend

Male

Female

Maximus

Ingeus

Taqat Elm

Avanta

Al Quryat

Ar’ar

Sakaka

Dammam

Tabouk

Madinah

Jeddah

Makkah

Ha’il

Al Baha

Taif

Bureidah

Abha

Riyadh

Khobar

Al Hofuf

Najran

Jizan

Eastern Region

Najran

Ar Riyadh

Jizan

Aseer

Al Baha

Makkah

Qassim

Al Madinah

Tabouk

Hail

Al Jouf

Northern Border

Northern Border region is the least populous region of Saudi Arabia with only 350,000 residents

compared to Ar Riyadh that has a population in the region of 7.5 million. Over 90% of jobs posted on

the Taqat Online jobs portal were limited to three regions – Makkah, Ar Riyadh and the Eastern

Region. This may be indicative of opportunities within the three regions but is also likely to be

driven by the fact that employers in other regions are less likely to use this channel. Smaller scale

employers may be less likely to advertise online and in many cases jobs in more rural locations can

often be filled through word of mouth.

Figure 3: Map of JPCs in Saudi Arabia

Source: CESI representation based on provider data

Due to the inconsistent distribution of the Saudi population throughout the country, there are many

JPCs located in densely populated areas and very few in other regions. For example, as evident from

the map, there are no JPCs directly South and South East of Riyadh. This is why there is a reliance on

online services through the Taqat employment channels. The location of some JPCs also corresponds

to the planned locations of some of Saudi Arabia’s new economic cities such as in Jizan and Hail.

The government has sought to implement a payment model similar to the United Kingdom’s, based

on results. However, the lack of market maturity has meant providers have required fixed fees

initially to fund initial set up costs.

The government went through a period of setting up pilots, contracting providers to deliver services

rather than contracts being put out to tender. For this reason, payment models differ markedly

between providers and there is no standardisation. HRDF has been through a process of contract

renegotiation but the focus of the renegotiation was to reduce the payment of fixed costs and

increase the level of payment by results.

An important part of the payment model for existing providers has been ‘fixed’ payments to

providers to fund set up costs. As providers are becoming more embedded, the proportion of fixed

costs that the government is willing to pay is reducing significantly and more payments are being

made for attachments, placements and sustainment. The government has stated that it is focused on

paying providers according to measurable outcomes and results.

As with the maturity of the market, the proportion of payment that is based on results is far lower

than in the UK. Specific arrangements are commercially sensitive but are broadly based on a 50/50