Background Image
Previous Page  23 / 186 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 186 Next Page
Page Background

Urban Transport in the OIC Megacities

13

technology allows much greater travel time flexibility, including mobile working. Travel can be

replaced by more “at home” activities such as working from home, shopping and booking holidays. As

such the key policy objective now becomes that of reasonable and reliable travel time, rather than

travel time minimization (Low and Astle, 2009; Banister, 2008).

Various policies to manage the existing network capacity have been applied across the world, with

different levels of success. Regulatory policy instruments have played an important role in shaping

urban transport performance. Measures to manage car use and optimize the use of the existing

network capacity commonly include parking restrictions, emissions standards and driving

restrictions. Although such measures theoretically cover a wide range of objectives including

improving air quality, reducing congestion and increasing the efficiency of network utilization, many

case studies show that regulatory measures alone often fail to fulfil their potential.

3.3.1.2.

Transport network and infrastructure of megacities in developing countries

In developing countries, the monocentric form of street design and planning that characterised many

cities in the colonial era started to change in the 20

th

century and accelerated with the independence

of countries from the 1950s onwards. Street designs became more irregular following the

peripherisation of urban growth and the displacement of poorer groups to the outskirts of cities. The

levels of road infrastructure vary among countries of the developing world, reflecting to a large extent

the economic status of each country. Less than 10% of land area is devoted to roads in many cities of

Africa, South and Southeast Asia (e.g. Nairobi, Kolkata, and Jakarta) compared to 15-20% in many

rapidly emerging economies (e.g. Seoul and Sao Paulo), 20-25% in much of the continental Europe

(e.g. London and Paris) and 35% or more in America’s largest automobile oriented cities (e.g. Houston

and Atlanta). However, the biggest problem for developing countries is that the infrastructure

provision and its development are inconsistent with the growth in traffic volumes. In India, the annual

traffic growth rate in the 1990s was around 5% in Mumbai, 7% in Chennai and 10% in Delhi despite

the fact that these cities only expanded their network by 1% (United Nations, 2013a; Cervero, 2013).

In the countries with the lowest levels of road network development, except for the lack of road

capacity, another major issue is the lack of road hierarchy that allows for efficient traffic flows from

local streets to distributor/collectors and to main arterials. For instance, Nairobi, Kenya, a city of 4

million inhabitants, has few collector streets and major through roads compared to similar sized

developed cities. In addition, the city’s arterial roads are mostly radial and the lack of circumferential

roads brings heavy amounts of traffic through the central business district with significant effects on

traffic flows. The situation is similar in Lome, Togo, a city of nearly 1.5 million (INSSED-Togo, 2015),

where the trucks leaving the port are directed into the core of the city in the absence of bypass road

around the city (Cervero, 2013).

Another crucial problem in developing countries is the lack of maintenance of existing transport

infrastructure, which is being neglected in favour of starting new, highly visible projects. According to

the World Bank, the fact that many countries tend to favour new construction, rehabilitation, or

reconstruction over maintenance has led to a steady increase in the parts of the network that need to

be repaired and a loss of development impact. For example, in Sub-Saharan Africa, for every kilometre

of road rehabilitated, an estimated three kilometres of road fall into disrepair, leading to a net

deterioration in the total road network. In a rapidly growing urban environment, the condition of the

poorly maintained road network is aggravated by a high number of vehicles using the network and

particularly heavy trucks as wear and tear exponentially rises with the dead axle weight of a vehicle.

In turn, poorly maintained streets slow trucks more than lighter vehicles, which results in increased

vehicle operating costs and has an overall effect on congestion (Rioja, 2003; Burningham and

Stankevich, 2005; Cervero, 2013).

However, the need for additional, key infrastructure in the cities and megacities of the developing

world is not always addressed using what is considered best practice. On the contrary, in many cases,

the adopted solutions involve increasing the capacity of the network and the provision of parking