Previous Page  36 / 169 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 36 / 169 Next Page
Page Background

Reducing On-Farm Food Losses

In the OIC Member Countries

22

In Benin, harvesting loses for cassava were 13.6% (Bokanga 1999). Comparisons of reported

losses in cases where interventions were made to reduce losses via improved handling and

storage) showed results of approximately 50% decreases.

In Mozambique and Mali, losses for cassava were reported by AGRA (2013) to be 27%. Yams in

Nigeria were reported to suffer 12.4% physical losses, which was an economic loss of 10.5%

(Okoh 1997) while losses for cassava were reported by AGRA (2013) as 28%, with yam losses

at 37% due to damage during the harvest. For West Africa, it is estimated that 10‐50% of yam

tubers are lost during on‐farm storage (Amusa et al 2003) and a further 10‐40% are lost during

transport due to damage and rots (Rees and Bancroft 2003). Losses for both sweet potatoes and

cassava were reported by AGRA (2013) as 20 to 25% in Uganda.

Average harvest losses in Bangladesh for potato were reported to be 6% (Hossain 2009) while

Zulfiqar et al (2005) reported on losses in potatoes (12%) in Pakistan. In Tajikistan, losses in

potatoes were reported to be 4.9% (production stage); 5.2% (postharvest/storage); 0.2%

(processing and packaging); 6.4% (distribution) and 4.3% (marketing) for a total of 22%

(Nabieva 2015),

An FAO-sponsored food loss assessment in Guyana reported that postharvest losses of cassava

were 23.0% for farmers who retailed at the public, roadside or mobile markets (Craig et al

2015). At harvest, total losses for cassava averaged 6.5%mainly due to physical damages, where

pathological and entomological damages were 3.0% and 3.5% respectively (Mohammed et al

2015). A similar FAO study in Turkey reported losses for potatoes at 7% due to a number of

unfavorable practices: poor cultivation practices, damage at harvesting caused by tuber cuts,

leaving tubers in the field, untimely harvesting, harvesting on wet land, and harvesting under

unfavorable temperatures (Tatlıdil et al, 2013).