Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 143 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 143 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance:

Developing Agricultural Market Information Systems

111

Indonesia in the 1990s was one of the lead countries in operating 1GMIS and has continued to

maintain a predominantly government-run system. It has in place legislative framework with

clearly defined roles for various government agencies in providing market information. The

Ministry of Agriculture focuses on collecting and disseminating wholesale prices for agricultural

produce whilst the remit of the Ministry of Trade concentrates on retail prices.

The Badan Pusat

Statistik (BPS or National Office of Statistics) has statutory authority to regulate information

collection and dissemination, including assuring the

quality of information disseminated.

Government funds MIS operations, in part through utilising part of the staff time of personnel at

relevant district, provincial and national levels. The information collected is shared with major

players such as WFP, which monitors the food supply situation principally for food security

reasons.

Despite being well-structured and generating information which is valuable to policymakers,

evidence obtained from this study shows that farmers and other market actors are not accessing

the MIS and using the information provided as a basis for their marketing strategies and

investment decisions. For instance, farmers and traders in and around Bogor, who were

interviewed during the study, indicated that they mainly obtain price information by phoning

potential buyers in different markets. As such the mobile phones (standard phones or

smartphones) play an important role for farmers in terms of obtaining information for

bargaining but not as anticipated in theory – i.e. by checking published prices. The ongoing

development of WRS and structured trading systems, including auction markets, which is led by

the government regulator COFTRA, is anticipated to boost the quality of information

disseminated by MIS whilst enhancing prospects for successful development of the market

institutions.

Uganda has advanced from being one of the pioneers of 1GMIS in the 1990s (with FOODNET) to

a landscape populated by a wide range 2GMIS platforms provided by the government and

private organisations as well as by NGOs. The diversity of existing MIS platforms is further

shown by the fact that whilst some were limited to national coverage, especially the private ones,

others covered regional and international market information. However, most of the

stakeholders consulted reported not being aware of and/or not accessing existing MIS. The

stakeholders include farmers, traders (both small-scale rural traders and large-scale ones),

warehouse operators and bankers. Even among policymakers, several did not consult the

existing MIS. The only exceptions are policymakers working on food security and agricultural

extension issues such as NAADS, and development practitioners whose remit includes

interventions to mitigate food crisis (e.g. officials of WFP and USAID).

Among the factors identified as limiting uptake of existing MIS by key market actors in the

country is the

apparent disconnect between the information stakeholders perceive as crucial to

their trade and investment decisions and what is offered on the MIS platforms. Trend analysis

is oftenmissing and the price information provided tends to be de-linked fromquality standards

which are enforced in the formal segments of the markets. Reliable output forecasts and data on

available stocks within the country are often not reported. Also missing, as is the case in Uganda,

is information on prices and availability of quality inputs. The price data reported also does not

reflect actual transactions with auditable trail but rather information obtained by phoning or

interviewing traders. Farmers and traders in both Indonesia and Uganda find it quicker and

more reliable to phone their peers and other traders directly rather than consult MIS. As is the

case in most countries, policymakers appear to be the most equipped to utilise market

information for policy actions, including food security.