Background Image
Previous Page  61 / 127 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 127 Next Page
Page Background

Barriers and Opportunities for Enhancing Capital Flows

In the COMCEC Member Countries

53

(previously the European Economic Community) dates back to 1963. Turkey was quick to take

part in the movement towards economic liberalisation in the 1980s.

Turkey has performed well in terms of its adherence to the OECD

Code of Liberalisation of

Capital Movements

. From 1962 to 1985, Turkey benefited from a special dispensation.

Thereafter, however, in parallel with the steps it had begun to take towards liberalising capital

movements, Turkey began to adhere to the obligation to eliminate reservations for all

measures that limit or restrict operations listed in the Code. Turkey went on rapidly to

establish full current-account convertibility and capital-account liberalisation in the 1980s,

liberalising outward direct investment and portfolio investment at the same time, and

achieving Article VIII status under the IMF’s Articles of Agreement in 1992 . Although the ebb

and flow of short-term capital inflows has contributed to economic instability on a number of

occasions, subsequent changes in legislation and regulation have been overwhelmingly in the

direction of liberalisation.

55

Turkey’s reservations regarding the OECD Code are quite limited in number. For example, with

respect to FDI, limited reservations or conditions are in force concerning mineral prospecting

rights and media companies, suggesting lingering concerns about sovereignty and security.

More generally, foreign investors in productive assets are expected to establish domestic legal

entities; then they are treated in the same way as other domestic companies. With respect to

financial investments, the few legal and regulatory limitations are mainly of a prudential

nature, affecting insurance assets and trade financing, for example, as well as domestic sales of

foreign securities.

56

In recent years, Turkey has continued to take steps to liberalise capital movements – even in

the areas where it has made reservations to the OECD Code. In October 2010, new rules on the

registration of public offerings and sales of foreign securities in Turkey abolished the

requirement to conduct public offerings of foreign stocks in Turkey through depository

receipts. Since March 2011, foreigners have been permitted to own up to 50% of two media

companies, compared with 25% of one media company previously. Finally, a law of May 2012

eased various restrictions on the acquisition of real estate in Turkey by foreign individuals and

companies.

57

As a candidate member of the EU, Turkey is required to adhere to the Treaty on the

Functioning of the European Union, including prohibiting restrictions on the movement of

capital. In this context, the 2013 Progress Report of the European Commission states that the

acquisition of real estate by foreigners in Turkey remains to be fully liberalised in line with the

acquis communtaire

(the body of EU law), and that restrictions on foreign ownership persist in

55

International capital flows: Structural reforms and experience with the OECD Code of Liberalisation of

Capital Movements

” - Report from the OECD to the G20 Sub-Group on Capital Flow Management

June 2011

56

Turkey’s reservations are noted on pages 126-129 of the OECD Code of Capital Movements 2013 at

http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/CapitalMovements_WebEnglish.pdf

57

For details see ‘The OECD Freedom of Investment Process: Inventory of investment measures taken

between November 15

th

2008 and February 15

th

2013’ a

t http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment- policy/FOIinventorymeasures_March_2013.pdf