Background Image
Previous Page  103 / 127 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 127 Next Page
Page Background

Barriers and Opportunities for Enhancing Capital Flows

In the COMCEC Member Countries

95

category. These are then adjusted, on the basis of a linear

transformation, to produce index values on a 1-10 scale. An

arithmetic average of the ten category index values is then

calculated to yield the aggregate business environment score

for each country, again on a 1-10 scale.

The use of equal weights for the categories to derive the

overall score reflects in part the theoretical uncertainty

about the relative importance of the primary determinants

of investment. Surveys of foreign direct investors’ intentions

yield widely differing results on the relative importance of

different factors. Weighted scores for individual categories

based on correlation coefficients of recent foreign direct

investment inflows do not in any case produce overall

results that are significantly different to those derived from a

system based on equal weights.

For most quantitative indicators the data are arrayed in

ascending or descending order and split into five bands

(quintiles). The countries falling in the first quintile are

assigned scores of 5, those falling in the second quintile

score 4 and so on. The cut-off points between bands are

based on the average of the raw indicator values for the top

and bottom countries in adjacent quintiles. The 2008-2012

ranges are then used to derive 2013-2017 scores. This

allows for intertemporal as well as cross-country

comparisons of the indicator and category scores.

The indices and rankings attempt to measure the average

quality of the business environment over the entire

historical or forecast period, not simply at the start or at the

end of the period. Therefore in the forecast we assign an

average grade to elements of the business environment over

2013-2017, not to the likely situation in 2017 only.

The scores based on quantitative data are usually calculated

on the basis of the numeric average for an indicator over the

period. In some cases, the “average” is represented, as an

approximation, by the recorded value at the mid-point of the

period (2010 or 2015). In only a few cases is the relevant

variable appropriately measured by the value at the start of

the period (for example, educational attainments). For one

indicator (the natural resources endowment), the score

remains constant for both the historical and forecast

periods.

The main sources used for the historical period scores

include CIA,

World Factbook

; Economist Intelligence Unit,

Country Risk Service

; Economist Intelligence Unit,

Country

Measurement and grading issues

Sources