Previous Page  164 / 225 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 164 / 225 Next Page
Page Background

Forced Migration in the OIC Member Countries:

Policy Framework Adopted by Host Countries

154

Article 8 on the right to family life

131

have been used to prevent the return of forced migrants

to countries where they are judged to be at risk of “inhuman or degrading treatment” (Article

3) or where return would separate family members (Article 8). Applicants for asylum in

Sweden may appeal to the ECtHR on the basis of a violation of the ECHR once all appeal

possibilities at the national level are exhausted. This additional level of appeal—and the

opportunity for individuals to bring challenges directly—is unusual among similar regional or

multilateral human rights instruments. Member governments, particularly those in the

European Union, have broadly conformed to the court’s judgements, and as a result, the court

has had a powerful role in shaping implementation of asylum law within ECHR members.

132

The EU directives and regulations that comprise the Common European Asylum System

(CEAS) provide another set of standards with which Swedish protection policies must comply.

The CEAS consists of a core set of directives that set out the legal basis upon which refugee

and other forms of protection are granted (2011 Qualification Directive),

133

basic standards

around asylum procedures (2013 Asylum Procedures Directive),

134

and the support and

benefits afforded to asylum applicants while their claims are processed (2013 Reception

Conditions Directive).

135

These directives lay out minimum standards which must then be

transposed into national law. In most cases, national governments have some room to

implement different, usually higher, standards if they choose. The Qualification Directive

provides for two types of protection: (1) refugee status granted on the basis of the definition

in the 1951 Convention, and (2) subsidiary protection for individuals who fear "serious harm"

defined as "(a) the death penalty or execution; or (b) torture or inhuman or degrading

treatment or punishment... or (c) serious and individual threat to a civilian's life or person by

reason of indiscriminate violence in situations of international or internal armed conflict."

136

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) offers legal recourse to those who feel their

rights under EU law have been violated, and serves as an EU court of last resort once all

national appeals options have been exhausted. Again, the extra, supranational level of appeal

is unique in regional protection instruments.

Protection in Sweden in law and in practice

The basic standards for providing refugee protection in Sweden are set out within the 2005

Aliens Act.

137

As per EU law, the Aliens Act provides for two primary forms of protection: (1)

131

Article 8(1) stipulates that “Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his

correspondence.” The right to family unity under the ECHR has been called upon to prevent the enforcement of return

decisions or EU transfer decisions for asylum applicants and protection beneficiaries that would result in the separation of

family members. See European Court of Human Rights, “European Convention on Human Rights.”

132

Henri Labayle and Philippe de Bruycker,

The Influence of ECJ and ECtHR Case Law on Asylum and Immigration

(Brussels:

European

Parliament,

2012),

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2012/462438/IPOL- LIBE_ET(2012)462438(SUM01)_EN.pdf .

133

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, “Directive 2011/95/EU on standards for the qualification

of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees

or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted,” December 13, 2011, EUR-

LEX, L 337/9

, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32011L0095

134

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, “Directive 2013/32/EU on common procedures for

granting and withdrawing international protection,” June 26, 2013, EUR-LEX, L180/60,

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/en/ALL/?uri=celex%3A32013L0032

135

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, “Directive 2013/33/EU laying down standards for the

reception of applicants for international protection,” June 26, 2013, EUR-LEX, L180/96,

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013L0033

136

European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, “Directive 2011/95/EU”

137

Aliens Act

, Swedish Law 2005:716,

Rättsnätet

(September 29, 2015

) http://www.notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/20050716.htm