Previous Page  91 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 91 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

81

Based on the literature review, the results of the survey are categorised into high/middle income

countries and low income countries, which allows for validation of the findings of the literature

review. Due to the limited number of high income countries in the survey, high and middle

income countries are combined in this section.

It should be noted that not all respondents completed the entire questionnaires; eight

respondents fully completed the Stage 1 survey questionnaire and 11 respondents fully

completed the Stage 2 survey questionnaire. Some of the questions in the Stage 2 survey were

not mandatory. It should also be noted that some countries are represented by more than one

respondent in the Stage 2 survey. The section below summarises the main findings of the

surveys.

8.2

Survey Results

Road safety is considered to be a high priority issue in all of the countries that participated in

the survey.

Road Safety Management

Most of the countries have a national strategy. Most respondents indicated that if a country had

a road safety lead agency, the responsibilities of the agency were limited to road safety policy

development and implementation and legislation. Road safety funding was not a core function

of the lead agency. Not all lead agencies in the low income countries have a specific and

dedicated budget allocated for road safety and most of the lead agencies are considered to have

insufficient resources means to perform their tasks.

High and medium income countries mostly coordinate responsibilities on road safety policy

between the different government agencies and departments, while low income countries

mostly coordinate responsibilities on education & training and vehicle legislation & standards.

Road safety in the high and middle income countries is generally well-coordinated, while it is

less well-coordinated in the low income countries.

The participating low income countries reported not to have performance targets, while most

of the high and middle income countries reported to have such targets. Based on the survey

results, R&D tasks are similar in high, middle and low income countries. High andmiddle income

countries have more road safety instruments and tools to ensure higher road safety, such as

road safety audits and inspections. Expansion of the road network and improving maintenance

have a high priority in all of the countries.

Roads and mobility

Road design standards for national roads are considered to be of good quality in high, middle

and low income OIC member countries. For regional roads, standards are generally better in

high and middle income countries than in low income countries. Local road design standards

are considered to be average to good in high and middle income countries, while mostly

considered to be poor in low income countries.