Previous Page  114 / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 114 / 185 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Road Safety

in the OIC Member States

104

that probably

no

(non) is filled in whereas it may have been more accurate to fill in “Unknown”

(

non renseigne)

. This is an important distinction.

Records with a

yes

for one or more of these variables are presented i

n Table 22,

together with

the proportion of the total that scored

yes

. It is evident from these results that in some crashes

more than one HF has been assigned since the total of records with a

yes

recorded for HF is

higher than the number of records (the “Signalements” data file contains records of 20156

crashes and there are 27348

yes

HFs recorded). The majority of the records, however, have been

assigned other human factors (

autres causes humaines)

, which is not very informative. This

could suggest that in the majority of the cases this variable is ticked, and all others are

no

by

default. If that is the case, the meaning of the

no

for all other values is not meaningful.

Table 22: Number of records with a yes for any of the human factor variables

Human Factor Descriptor

Yes Records

Yes Rate

Professional error (

defautdemetrise)

3,517

17.4%

Dangerous overtaking

(depassements dangereux)

593

2.9%

High speed

(excesvitesse)

3,768

18.7%

Fatigue

88

0.4%

Inattention

6,167

30.6%

Drink-driving

(ivresse du conducteur)

179

0.9%

Dangerous manoeuvre

(mouvement dangereux)

438

2.2%

Overloading

(surcharge)

107

0.5%

Dangerous parking

(stationnementDangereux)

129

0.6%

Caused by pedestrian

(cause par pieton)

653

3.2%

Impaired driving by medicine or drugs

(medicament ou drogue)

4

0.0%

Other (autre cause humaine)

11,705

58.1%

Table 22

reveals that while for the majority of the crashes a human factor is supposed to be an

important factor, in 58.1% of these cases this factor is “other”. This suggests that, as the actual

factor was not specified, it was not observed.

10.3 Road Safety Management

A primary function in road safety management is a strong focus on results, in other words,

setting of ambitious but realistic targets for road safety. These are not only in terms of targets

for crashes and related injuries, but also relate to aspects such as critical offences, levels of

investment, economic impacts, capacity, enforcement and any other aspects important for a

country to achieve improvements. Based on recent discussions with stakeholders and a review

of supporting documentation, there is little evidence to support a strong results focus in

Cameroon.

Road safety has recently become a national priority in Cameroon with strong political support

and a national sense of urgency fromboth public, private and civil society to redress the growing