Previous Page  81 / 214 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 81 / 214 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Transnational Transport Corridors

In the OIC Member Countries: Concepts and Cases

67

4.2.3.

Trade Facilitation

Different OIC regions have different objectives when it comes to the transport corridors

development. For Asia, transport corridor secretariats like CAREC, TRACECA, and ECO have an

objective to open-up the trade potential of the many landlocked Central Asian countries,

promote intra-trade along the corridors, and to accommodate trade between Asia and Europe.

As for Africa, unlocking the landlocked countries is also one of the main objectives together

with poverty reduction. Since maritime access is not an issue for the MENA region, transport

corridors are mainly considered as catalysts to enhance regional integration and trade

cooperation, although this is not yet achieved. Regarding the Middle East (Islamic

Development Bank 2011) identifies that a major problem for this region seems to be the low

level of economic integration by way of international trade. This is most likely the result of the

absence of proper transport corridors. This is also shown by the level of intra-trade in the OIC

regions, which accounts for less than 10% of total trade.

Non-physical barriers to trade are major bottlenecks in OIC countries. Unofficial payments

(corruption), multiple checkpoints, cumbersome border crossing, high insurance and tax, are

some of the non-physical barriers that hampering the level of trade facilitation in OIC transport

corridors.

(Islamic Development Bank 2011) also argues that with regard to the adopted objective of

promoting intra-OIC trade, it can be seen that significant progress has been achieved in the last

decade in the OIC region. The majority of the OIC member states have also now taken

measures to liberalize their foreign trade: the number of countries with average tariffs higher

than 20 percent and very high non-tariff barriers has dropped sharply by about 30 percent,

decreasing from 64 percent in 1995 to 38 percent in 2005. On the other hand it seems that

non-tariff barriers are yet to be tackled properly, with cumbersome customs and

administrative procedures in place, technical barriers to trade, quantitative restrictions on

imports, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, etc. This situation is especially very

problematic in the SSA region.

The cost of transport is a factor influencing competitiveness of a country, and having a strong

link with infrastructure. OIC – SESRIC (2016) analyses “the average trade costs for different

country groups over the period 1995-2012. As it is evident, although tariffs in many countries

are now at historical lows, overall trade costs remain high. Average trade costs tend to exhibit

higher trade costs particularly in developing countries. OIC countries, on average, display even

higher trade costs. In 2012, trade costs in OIC countries (179% ad valorem) were on average

two times higher than those in developed countries (86% ad valorem).”