Previous Page  123 / 152 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 123 / 152 Next Page
Page Background

Single Window Systems

In the OIC Member States

113

Annex I: OIC Member States Profile Information on Single Window

Efforts

By the end of 2016, out of the 57 OIC Member States, 22 have an operational Single Window and

35 currently do not have a Single Window

. Table 31

below shows the status for each of the OIC

Member States.

Table 31: SW Implementation Status in OIC Member States

No Plan (19)

Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Chad,

Comoros, Djibouti,

Gabon, Gambia, Iraq,

Kazakhstan,

Libya, Mauritania,

Niger,

Palestine, Somalia

,

Sierra Leone, Syria,

Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Yemen

Not formalized Vision (5)

Albania,

Guinea

,

Guyana

,

Lebanon,

Pakistan

Formally adopted vision (6)

Guinea - Bissau, Jordan, Maldives, Nigeria,

Sudan,

Suriname

In implementation process (5)

Algeria,

Egypt

, Oman,

Turkey,

Uganda

Operational First Phase (15)

Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Benin, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina

Faso,

Cote d'Ivoire,

Iran, Kuwait, Mali, Mozambique,

Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Togo, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates

Redesign second phase (6)

Cameroon, Indonesia, Kyrgyz Republic, Malaysia,

Morocco, Tajikistan

Operational Second Phase (1)

Senegal

On the following pages country-by-country profiles for 38 OIC Member States. The OIC Member

States that are included in the country profiles are in red color in the Table 31 above.

For 19 OIC MS no profiles were drafted due to insufficient information

81

. Out of these 19 OIC MS,

15 Member States do not have a Single Window or a Single Window plan/ formal vision. Two,

Egypt and Turkey, are currently undertaking a Single Window project, and one MS has an

operational Single Window, Cote d’Ivoire.

81

Insufficient information means that the no reply to the questionnaire was received and no information from reliable

government sources is available.