Single Window Systems
In the OIC Member States
113
Annex I: OIC Member States Profile Information on Single Window
Efforts
By the end of 2016, out of the 57 OIC Member States, 22 have an operational Single Window and
35 currently do not have a Single Window
. Table 31below shows the status for each of the OIC
Member States.
Table 31: SW Implementation Status in OIC Member States
No Plan (19)
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Chad,
Comoros, Djibouti,
Gabon, Gambia, Iraq,
Kazakhstan,
Libya, Mauritania,
Niger,
Palestine, Somalia
,
Sierra Leone, Syria,
Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Yemen
Not formalized Vision (5)
Albania,
Guinea
,
Guyana
,
Lebanon,
Pakistan
Formally adopted vision (6)
Guinea - Bissau, Jordan, Maldives, Nigeria,
Sudan,
Suriname
In implementation process (5)
Algeria,
Egypt
, Oman,
Turkey,
Uganda
Operational First Phase (15)
Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Benin, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina
Faso,
Cote d'Ivoire,
Iran, Kuwait, Mali, Mozambique,
Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Togo, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates
Redesign second phase (6)
Cameroon, Indonesia, Kyrgyz Republic, Malaysia,
Morocco, Tajikistan
Operational Second Phase (1)
Senegal
On the following pages country-by-country profiles for 38 OIC Member States. The OIC Member
States that are included in the country profiles are in red color in the Table 31 above.
For 19 OIC MS no profiles were drafted due to insufficient information
81
. Out of these 19 OIC MS,
15 Member States do not have a Single Window or a Single Window plan/ formal vision. Two,
Egypt and Turkey, are currently undertaking a Single Window project, and one MS has an
operational Single Window, Cote d’Ivoire.
81
Insufficient information means that the no reply to the questionnaire was received and no information from reliable
government sources is available.