Previous Page  97 / 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 97 / 148 Next Page
Page Background

Strengthening the Compliance of the OIC Member States

to International Standards

83

can form the basis for upgrading industrial competitiveness in key industries, both primary and

secondary.

Although there has been some regional cooperation on standards within the context of SAARC, efforts

are as yet nascent in this regard. Given that standards infrastructure is better developed in some

neighboring countries like India, there may be scope for South-South capacity building in this regard. In

any event, regional markets are important for exports of some goods, so standards cooperation could

bear fruit in terms of improved prospects for Bangladeshi exporters. However, since the main markets

for Bangladesh’s key RMG industry are distant—the US and the EU, in particular—focusing on

international standards makes commercial and policy sense, as it enables producers to meet the

requirements of GVCs and lead firms that need products of consistent quality and characteristics. The

Bangladesh example shows that international standards harmonization can be one way in which

developing countries can go about upgrading their industrial structures in key industries where GVCs

are prevalent.

6.2.2

Egypt

Egypt is a lower middle income country, with a per capita GDP of USD $10,530 in purchasing power

parity terms in 2014. As such, it is considerably further up the income charts than Bangladesh and

Senegal, the two other countries used as case studies in this report. Nonetheless, until the late 1990s,

Egypt’s standardization and quality infrastructure revealed a high degree of complexity, fragmentation,

and lack of transparency, which can be attributed to inward-oriented policies going back to the 1960s.

With the adoption of more open trade policies and the participation in several international

organizations, in addition to preferential and regional trade agreements, the standardization and quality

control system has witnessed significant improvements carried out by the government with the help of a

number of international organizations and trade-related technical assistance programs.

Figure 38 shows that the composition of Egypt’s exports is quite different from that of Bangladesh.

Mineral oils and fuels dominate, but other products are also important, both manufactured goods and

agricultural products. Another difference with Bangladesh is that the sources of demand for Egypt’s

exports are more varied, with a more important role played by developing countries, including India, as

well as geographically relatively close countries like Saudi Arabia and Turkey (Figure 39).