Previous Page  106 / 148 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 106 / 148 Next Page
Page Background

Strengthening the Compliance of the OIC Member States

to International Standards

92

Inspection and conformity assessment procedures for imports have been significantly simplified since

the late 1990s and have become more transparent. Existing decrees spell out details of sampling and

cost, introduce a formal appeals process, exempt frequent importers with a clean record, and allow

GOEIC to recognize and accept inspections conducted in agencies outside Egypt (USAID, 2003). The

main problem is, however, related to the dichotomy of inspection and conformity assessment bodies in

charge of markets for internal supply and for imported goods. As explained previously, the market for

imports and exports is controlled by GOEIC. Meanwhile, EOS and other authorities are in charge of the

internal supply market. Traded products may not be treated equally as conformity assessment bodies

are totally separate and have different work methods.

11

Domestic goods are inspected in laboratories of

the Ministry of Health, the Society for Chemistry, or the Industrial Control Authority, and certified for

conformity by EOS. In the “market” for imports and exports, all of these functions are assumed by GOEIC.

There is a probability that, despite initially common rules and standards set out by EOS, possible

discrimination between domestic and imported goods may occur.

In 2004, Egypt started the process of harmonization with international standards and had entirely

harmonized its 387 mandatory standards in addition to 1,000 voluntary standards by 2005. An

additional set of 1,000 voluntary standards was harmonized in 2006 (Egypt Business Intelligence

Report, 2014). Ministerial decree 130/2005 also clearly separates mandatory standards related to

health, safety, and the environment from other measures. Egypt is also bringing its domestic regulations

in line with European legislation in selected manufacturing sectors and withdrawing any conflicting

national standards to support manufacturers in their exports to the EU (OECD, 2010).

However, there are currently 10,000 Egyptian standards, 1,000 of which are mandatory standards

issued by EOS. Although the plan to expand sectoral coverage and continue the harmonization process is

clearly stated by EOS as one of its missions, there is no precise information on the progress so far.

6.2.2.3

Impact of Technical Assistance and Capacity Building

Since the entry into force of the EU-Egypt Association Agreement in 2004, the EU has provided Egypt

with over €80m in trade-related assistance.

12

The EU being Egypt’s largest trading partner, it is in the

national interest to enhance its quality infrastructure to increase and maintain its access to EU markets.

In light of the EU-Egypt Association Agreement, Ministerial Decree 263/2001 was issued to prepare for

11

This problem has been discussed in a background report on the EU-Egypt Twinning program of quality infrastructure (2014,

unpublished) as a potential cause of discrimination against imported products.

12

Website of the Delegation of the European Union to Egypt

http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/egypt/eu_egypt/trade_relation/index_en.htm