Background Image
Previous Page  16 / 118 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 16 / 118 Next Page
Page Background

FACILITATING INTRA-OIC TRADE:

Improving the Efficiency of the Customs Procedures in the OIC Member States

6

CHAPTER

I: TRADE FACILITATION

For a long time, tariffs stayed atop of the agenda of multilateral trade negotiations under

the GATT which was first launched just after the Second World War. Not only had these

negotiations but also the regional and unilateral efforts contributed to reducing the tariffs

considerably over the years. World tariffs have fallen from an average of

more than 20%

in the 1930s to

less than 3%

in 2010 (McClanahan 2013a).

Many countries including the developing countries and LDCs have reduced their tariffs

dramatically over the years. Despite lower tariffs, some of these countries could not

increase their foreign trade at desired level due to various reasons such as higher trade

costs, undiversified production and export markets, limited financial resources etc.

Trade costs, broadly defined, include all costs incurred in getting a good to a final user

other than the marginal cost of producing the good itself: transportation costs (both

freight costs and time costs), policy barriers (tariffs and nontariff barriers), information

costs, contract enforcement costs, costs associated with the use of different currencies,

legal and regulatory costs, and local distribution costs (wholesale and retail). (Anderson

and Wincoop 2004).

Some of the studies in the literature e.g. OECD (2001), Milner et al. (2008) and Brooks

et al. (2005) and ADB and UNESCAP (2013) classify the trade costs into two forms

namely direct and indirect costs. Direct costs include mostly compliance costs related to

supplying information and documents required for the movement of goods or related

means of payment, and charges for trade-related services (e.g. trade insurance, port

management). On the other hand, indirect costs include procedural delays and difficult

to measure but has a considerable impact on trade.

The impact of trade costs on international trade has been investigated by many studies

in recent years. For example, using the Doing Business Indicators of the World Bank,

Djankov et al. (2006) investigated the impact of time delays on international trade. They

found that each additional day that a product is delayed prior to being shipped reduces

trade by at least 1 percent. Delays have an even greater impact on developing country

exports and exports of time sensitive goods, such as perishable agricultural products.

According to their estimates, reducing export times by 10 days (which is 48 days on

average) is likely to have a bigger impact on exports (expanding them by about 10

percent) than any feasible liberalization in Europe or North America. Sadikov (2007)

tested the impact of signatures exporters have to collect for shipment. The study

estimated that each extra signature place reduces aggregate exports by 4.2 percent.

Furthermore, it concluded that each signature lowers exports in differentiated products

by 4–5 percent more than it does in homogeneous goods.

Reducing these costs is one of the main objectives of trade facilitation. During the last two

decades importance of trade facilitation in increasing international trade has been