Previous Page  42 / 203 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 42 / 203 Next Page
Page Background

Special Economic Zones in the OIC Region:

Learning from Experience

28

Box 8 - Thailand’s SEZ Programme

Box 9 - Kaesong SEZ Programme

Thailand approved its SEZ programme in 2014 with the primary aim of driving regional economic

growth and targeting cross border trade. At present it is estimated that cross border trade

accounts for approximately 10% of total trade volumes within Thailand, but the SEZ programme

aims to increase this to 50% once fully deployed.

The programme aims to target investors interested in accessing labour and importing goods,

including raw materials and parts from countries neighbouring Thailand. The zones will aim to

develop supply chains and increase the domestic consumer market along Thailand’s border.

Target industries and activities include agriculture, manufacturing of textiles, ceramics, furniture,

gems, medical equipment and electronics as well as logistics, pharmaceuticals and tourism.

SEZ programmes can also be used to promote reform and encourage diplomatic relations as in

the case of the Kaesong SEZ which was established by North and South Korea. Formed in 2003,

the Kaesong Industrial Complex, when it was operational, employed approximately 47,000 North

Korean workers and 121 South Korean enterprises generating a total of $300 million in output.

The initial concept of the SEZ was to allow South Korean firms to utilise cheap North Korean

labour within manufacturing activities. The secondary benefit was to promote liberalisation and

economic reform within North Korea as well as provide the North Korean economy with much

needed foreign currency accumulation. It is estimated that the North Korean government

accumulated approximately $2 million per month from workers fees, land lease fees and other

payments. In addition, the government received a $12 million lease payment from the Hyundai

Asan Company who developed and operated the zone.

Key perceived factors of success included an increase in North and South Korean political

cooperation and acceleration of economic reform within North Korea as well as benefiting the

South Korean economy. However, overall economic performance has been low primarily due to

relatively small numbers of SMEs located to the zone and decreases in productivity. In addition,

there has been little evidence that the North Korean economy has improved since the creation of

the zone (Nam, 2012)

Unfortunately due to some political developments within the region, the Kaesong Industrial

Complex is currently closed demonstrating the fragility of cross border zones, particularly within

geographies of conflict.