Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  212 / 213 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 212 / 213 Next Page
Page Background

Improving Agricultural Market Performance

:

Creation and Development of Market Institutions

198

OIC MC

LINE MINISTRY

MARKET INSTITUTION

CLASSIFICATION(S)

FUNCTION(S)

enterprise

Uganda*

Ministry of

Health,

Tourism, Trade

& Industry

Ministry of

Agriculture,

Animal Industry

& Fisheries

a)

Uganda Co-operative

Alliance Ltd

a)

Cooperative

a)

Exchange &

facilitating

b)

Cotton Development

Organisation (CDO)

b)

Marketing board b)

Facilitating

c)

Dairy Development

Authority (DDA)

c)

Marketing board c)

Facilitating

d)

Uganda Coffee

Development Authority

(UCDA)

d)

Marketing board d)

Facilitating

e)

Uganda Commodity

Exchange (UCE)

e)

Commodity

exchange

platform

e)

Exchange &

facilitating

f)

Uganda Warehouse

Receipt System

Authority (UWRSA)

f)

Licensed public

warehousing

company

f)

Exchange &

physical

United Arab

Emirates

Ministry of

Environment

and Water

(MOEW)

a)

Fishery marketing

cooperatives

a)

Cooperative

a)

Exchange &

facilitating

Uzbekistan

Ministry of

Agriculture and

Water

Resources

(MAWR)

Ministry of

Health (MOH)

a)

Agricultural production

cooperatives

a)

Cooperative

a)

Exchange &

facilitating

b)

Uzvinprom-Holding

b)

State-owned

economic

enterprise

b)

Exchange &

physical

Yemen

Ministry of

Agriculture and

Irrigation

a)

Agriculture

Cooperative Union

a)

Cooperative

a)

Exchange &

facilitating

b)

Credit and Agricultural

Cooperative Bank

b)

State-owned

economic

enterprise

b)

Facilitating

c)

National Corporation

for Services and Fish

Marketing

c)

Marketing board c)

Facilitating

d)

Fisheries Cooperatives

Union

d)

Cooperative

d)

Exchange &

facilitating

e)

Coastal Fisheries

Corporation

e)

State-owned

economic

enterprise

e)

Exchange &

physical

*Based on country case studies in Chapter 5 – Other OIC Member Countries based on web and desk research

°Based on the WTO’s Trade Policy Reviews

The remainder is based on further desk research including sources of FAO (2017), World Bank (2017), US Department of

Commerce – export.gov (2017), and Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services (2017).