Previous Page  102 / 283 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 102 / 283 Next Page
Page Background

National and Global Islamic Financial Architecture:

Problems and Possible Solutions for the OIC Member Countries

84

KLRCA launched i-Arbitration Rules for resolving disputes arising in Shariah compliant

contracts. With i-Arbitration Rules complying with the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, KLRCA

provides opportunities for arbitrating both domestic and international Islamic finance

disputes in an efficient and effective manner (Hodges et. al 2012). Rule 8 of the i-Arbitration

Rules stipulates that any

Shariah

issues would be referred to one of the

Shariah

Advisory

Councils (SAC) or a

Shariah

expert, agreed upon by all parties, must be referred to for an

opinion (KLRCA 2102). KLRCA handled 156 cases in 2103, 20% of these being international

cases. The numbers of cases jumped to 226 by the third quarter of 2014 (Jiet 2015, Verghese

2014).

In order to strengthen the legal infrastructure to support the growth and development of

Islamic finance, BNM established the Law Harmonization Committee in 2010 (BNM 2011:

114). The objectives of harmonization of national laws and statutes with Islamic financial

contracts include achieving certainty and enforceability of the latter and help make Malaysia as

a legal reference for the settlement of disputes for international and cross border Islamic

transactions.

Bankruptcy and Resolution of Banks

Bankruptcy laws in Malaysia can be distinguished into two types, one for individuals and the

other for companies. While the Bankruptcy Act 1967 (BA 1967) and Bankruptcy Rules 1969

(BR 1969) govern bankruptcy of the former, the Companies Act 1965 (CA 1965) and Company

Winding-Up Rules 1972 (CR 1972) apply to the insolvencies of companies (Cheah and Yeoh

2009, Kannaperan undated). IFSA 2013 (Part XIV, Division 3) refers to CA 1965 and provides

specific insolvency related stipulations for Islamic banks and

takaful

companies. Specifically,

Section 217 of IFSA 2013 identifies the priority of payments to different stakeholders in case of

a winding up of a licensed Islamic bank and Section 218 does the same for a

takaful

company.

4.4.2. Financial System Regulation and Supervision Framework

The CBA 2009 defines the functions of BNM as promoting a sound, progressive and inclusive

financial system and regulating and supervising financial institutions that are subject to the

laws enforced by it. Both FSA 2013 and IFSA 2013 entrust BNM with broad and extensive

authority to ensure good governance and sound risk management practices in the regulated

institutions. BNM has an Islamic Banking and Takaful Department to deal with different issues

related to Islamic finance.

BNM (2015) published the Capital Adequacy Framework for Islamic Banks in October 2015,

detailing, among others, the capital charges for different types of risks (such as credit, market

and operational risks). The guidelines cover various risks arising in different modes of

financing such as

murabahah, ijarah, salam

, etc. One of the novel features of IFSA 2013 is that

it distinguishes between Islamic deposits and investment accounts. In line with Shariah

principles, returns on investment accounts depend on the performance of assets underlying

the account. As such, repayment of either principal or positive returns cannot be guaranteed.

Given this feature, the law requires that Islamic banks enhance their risk management

practices and also disclose relevant information to protect the investors (BNM 2013: 103).

BNM also issued standards for the sound management of Islamic investment accounts in 2014

which includes fulfilling the fiduciary mandates of good risk management and oversight of the

investments made from funds from these accounts (BNM 2014: 90).