Previous Page  38 / 44 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 38 / 44 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the 13

th

Meeting of the

Transport and Communications Working Group

34

national context. The manuals are expected to provide clear guidance on how project appraisal is

to be carried out, including:

A description of the appraisal process, with clearly defined steps, including project

identification, demand analysis, options analysis, options for financial sustainability,

return on the project and on private capital, economic analysis, and risk analysis.

Methodological standards, such as typical costs and benefits to be included, techniques

to deal with the monetization of benefits, etc.

Standard input parameters, such as project duration, discount rate, values of time, the

value of statistical life, etc. can be periodically reviewed.

The standardization and harmonization in transport project appraisals contribute to the credibility

of the results. Furthermore, it contributes to the ability to compare appraisal results, which may

be beneficial for the prioritization of projects.

Policy Recommendation III: Applying transport project appraisals as main part of a project

cycle and making use of quality data/information as well as the lessons generated from the

implementation of the previous project(s).

Rationale:

While project appraisal is a wider process, it is commonly used as an ex-ante evaluation of a

project for justifying an investment decision. Far from being confined to an ex-ante dimension in

the pre-feasibility stage, project appraisal should also be performed in-itinere and ex-post phases.

Furthermore, project appraisals necessarily rely on appropriate data and information. In order to

improve the quality of the appraisals, project data and information should be collected and made

available to the relevant national authorities for monitoring purposes and next project generation

as benchmark studies.

In addition, monitoring the implementation process of a project and carrying out a systematic ex-

post evaluation of a project is critically important to compare planning and implementation. This

will allow benchmarking the performance achieved during the implementation of the project and

providing lessons learned for the next project appraisals.

Policy Recommendation IV: Encouraging the enhancement of transport project appraisals

capacity through

a system of official certification of competences, exchange of experience,

training programs, seminars, conferences, and workshops, etc.

Rationale:

Adequate institutional and human capacity is of utmost importance for underpinning the better

transport project appraisals. It is also essential for having above-mentioned wider appraisal

framework and facilitating the decision-making process. The capacity in transport project

appraisals can be strengthened, among others, by: